Varun OS
Case study
Appearance
ResumeContact
Property CareProduct case study

Connecting property discovery with the work required to publish and manage it.

Property Care supports customers looking for properties, owners posting them, franchise teams managing activity and admins reviewing accounts. The Phase 2 design covered the workflow before and after a property appears in search.

Role
UI/UX Designer
Contribution
Web and mobile UI, forms, states and workflows
Platforms
Responsive web + mobile
Scope
Phase 2 product design
Property Care map and property listing interfaceProperty Care mobile property posted confirmation
Connected workflowOnboard → Publish → Discover → Enquire
01

Product model

The same property record supports different decisions.

A property seeker needs relevant results and enough detail to enquire. An owner or franchise user needs a structured way to post accurate information. The admin needs the context required to review accounts and manage operational states.

The interface changes by role, but the underlying property, requirement, enquiry and account records stay connected. This relationship shaped the navigation, form steps and status patterns across web and mobile.

DiscoverProperty seeker

Search, compare, save and enquire about properties

PublishProperty owner

Post a property and manage its information and status

OperateFranchise user

Complete onboarding and manage property activity

ReviewPlatform admin

Review franchise accounts, documents and account status

SupplyProperties
DemandRequirements
ActionEnquiries and requests
02

Franchise onboarding

Collect business information without turning onboarding into one long form.

The franchise flow divides business details, contact information and supporting documents into three steps. A separate admin view then brings those records together for review and status updates.

01Franchise info

Contract, service and location details

02Contact info

Primary and additional contacts

03Documents

Required evidence before submission

04Admin review

Approve, reject or keep the account on hold

Product evidenceFranchise setup and review
Real Phase 2 screens. The flow separates onboarding input from the admin review queue.
03

Post a property

Structure a detailed property record through progressive steps.

Posting a property requires category, service type, contact details, location, specifications, amenities and media. Showing every field together would make it difficult to understand what is complete and what still needs attention.

The step-based structure groups related information and keeps the current stage visible. Longer specification screens stay focused on one decision area while Back and Next preserve the larger workflow.

Decision

Group fields by the way users describe a property, rather than by database structure.

Reason

Property type, location, specifications, amenities and media require different kinds of input.

Trade-off

The flow takes more steps, but each step is easier to review and correct.

Wireframe exploration
Grouping the form around how people describe a propertyCompare the information-density options behind the eight-step structure.

Portfolio reconstruction based on delivered design.

01One long form

Fast to expose, difficult to scan and recover.

02Database groups

Matches the schema but not the user’s mental model.

03Task-based steps

Groups type, location, specifications, amenities and media around recognizable decisions.

Product evidenceProperty posting flow
Real screens from the eight-step property posting flow. Full-size images open in a separate tab.
04

Property requirements

Capture demand in a format the property catalogue can use.

Customers can describe the property they need through category, service type, budget, furnishing, urgency and contact details. Structured requirements create a clearer basis for suggested properties and follow-up.

NeedProperty category and service

Rent, lease or buy

+
FitBudget and property attributes

Rooms, furnishing and location

+
Follow-upContact and urgency

Who to contact and when

Product evidencePost a requirement
Real requirement screens showing the split between property criteria and contact information.
05

Discovery and enquiry

Keep search context visible while users compare properties.

The discovery experience combines map context, filters and listing results. Users can move from an area-level view to property details without losing the criteria used to find it.

The detail screen brings images, specifications, pricing, contact context and the enquiry action together. Favourites provide a lighter commitment before a user is ready to contact someone.

Product evidenceSearch and property detail
Real web screens. Search, map context, property detail and enquiry actions remain part of one connected task.
06

Web and mobile continuity

Show property state clearly on a smaller screen.

The mobile experience carries the same property information and publishing states into a narrow layout. Status is shown with a label and related action, rather than relying only on colour.

Draft recordPending

Information is available, but the property is still waiting for the next state.

Visible recordPublished

The property is available through the discovery experience.

ConfirmationPosted

The user receives a clear completion message after submission.

Product evidenceMobile property states
Real mobile screens. Long details remain available without shrinking the interface into unreadable thumbnails.
07

Reflection

The strongest part of the product is the relationship between supply, demand and operations.

01

Workflow structure

Separated onboarding, posting, requirements and discovery into clear tasks.

02

Cross-platform patterns

Carried property details, actions and statuses from web into mobile layouts.

03

Operational states

Designed admin review and property states so the next action remains visible.

What the design covers

A connected Phase 2 product workflow

The designs cover franchise onboarding, property supply, customer requirements, discovery, enquiries and mobile property states.

What I would validate next

Where users pause in the longest forms

I would test onboarding and property posting separately, then review completion, validation and return-to-draft behaviour with real users.

Outcome boundary

Verified usability results, adoption metrics and implementation outcomes were not available for this case study. The page documents the Phase 2 design work and the next validation steps without inventing impact.